6.10.2011 by HoisseBig.

James Ker Lindsey, expert

“Good plan opens chances for partition of Kosovo”
T. Spaic| 03. 10. 2011. - 00:02h |

‘Although some of the world most powerful countries are strongly opposing changing of borderlines, there are two realities in the field. One is that Kosovo is independent and the second one is that Serbs in the north are opposing authority of Pristina. It seems that it is possible to find a compromise. If Serbia has to accept independence of Kosovo, then Pristina has to accept that the north is a part of Serbia. Direct consequences of refusal of compromise shall have to bear both Serbia and Kosovo and not the USA or Russia’, James Ker Lindsey, British expert in international relations in the Southeast Europe says in his interview with ‘Blic’.

Professor at the London School of Economics and Political Science was in Belgrade several days ago where he promoted his latest book ‘Kosovo – The Path to Contested Statehood in the Balkans’, explains for ‘Blic’ that only countries not suffering direct consequences from their decisions can take hard stances.
‘Russia may have strong stance towards refusal of Kosovo independence but it does not have to pay for that by its relation with the EU as Belgrade does. The USA also can insist on its stance but that shall not cost it the UN membership or participation in sports competition, or having a postal code or the Internet domain. If that is underst

If that is understood then Belgrade and Pristina may try to reach a compromise’, Lindsey says.

What are the consequences of deployment of Kosovo policemen and customs officers in the north of Kosovo? Is that not a change of reality in the field?
- Pristina says clearly that it intends to establish the sovereignty in the whole territory of Kosovo. However, that need not mean that the last chance for negotiations over the Kosovo north has been lost. However, Serbian Government has to be very open towards the population and say that Serbia can no longer fight for the whole Kosovo. If we want to take the north, then we have to put some plan on the table. That has to be done very soon.

In what way can Belgrade do it?
- The key supporters of Pristina independence know that it shall not be easy and that it would cost them a lot that Pristina takes over control in the north because of strong hostility by the local Serbs towards authorities in Pristina. That is what Belgrade should use and put concrete proposals on the table offering solution. Presenting clear plans by Belgrade can open new possibility for negotiations over the north.

Who might support Belgrade’s plan?
- The authorities in Serbia first have to get support of the people in Serbia to accept one huge change. I do not believe there is an alternative. Campaign against recognition of Kosovo independence was incredibly successful, but prevention of recognition does not mean solution to the problem. Large number of countries that have not recognized Kosovo can be a good stake in negotiations. It is necessary to reach a solution that both sides would be able to live with.

…………..

http://english.blic.rs/News/8055/Good-plan-opens-chances-for-partition-of-Kosovo

NATO PR - side: setimes

Can the Pristina-Belgrade dialogue be saved?

05/10/2011

Serbia said it will not continue talks on technical issues with Pristina unless the northern border gates are discussed.

By Muhamet Brajshori and Linda Karadaku for Southeast European Times in Pristina — 05/10/11

Given the most recent clashes at the northern border crossings in Kosovo, the ongoing dialogue between Pristina and Belgrade is in jeopardy. The talks — which were scheduled to continue on September 28th — came to a screeching halt after Serbian representatives said they were no longer willing to participate unless the topic of the crossings in Kosovo’s north were revisited.

Security Studies Professor Avdullah Hasani tells SETimes that the current situation is unstable and benefits no one. “Innovative models of how the North can be governed must be found. The possibility of an EU interim administration might be a good solution, which would last until Kosovo and Serbia join the Union,” he says.

Arber Gashi, an EU policy researcher at the Kosovo Institute for Public Policy and Good Governance, says that the dialogue began wrong and ended wrong.

………………….

http://setimes.com/cocoon

“Partition possible solution for Kosovo problem”

Večernje novosti

BELGRADE — Erhard Busek says that “when the crisis in the north eases”, Priština, Belgrade and the international community should consider possible solutions for Kosovo.

The former Austrian vice-chancellor and coordinator of the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe specified in an interview for Belgrade’s Večernje Novosti daily that one of those solutions “could be a partition of Kosovo”.

Although there are few advocates of the idea in the EU at the moment, as most member-countries claim that “there can be no more change of borders in the Balkans”, Busek expressed his belief that in time, and with the crisis going on, things could change and that could become the prevailing stand in the union.

“Additional complications are of no use to anyone, and it is obvious that the current tactics do not give results. I agree that the dialogue is the only path, in scope of which issues which seem to be impossible at the moment should also be discussed, such as the division of Kosovo,” Busek told the newspaper.

The Austrian politician is convinced that the delineation of new frontiers in Kosovo and Metohija would not pose new problems for the region, but, as he put it, if everyone agrees on the matter, it would additionally and permanently stabilize the Balkans.

“I do not see why the international community would not agree on the division if Belgrade and Priština reached an agreement on the issue. All details of such resolution of the Kosovo stalemate could be agreed at some kind of ‘Kosovo Dayton’, with the international community as the guarantor of the accord,” Busek concluded.

at 5.10.11

Geschrieben in Balkan (Englisch) | 1 Kommentar »

6.10.2011 by Lupo.

Ex-IWF-Chefökonom über Bankenkrisen: “Ackermann ist gefährlich …

Demo in New York: Mit Hollywood-Power gegen die Macht der Banken

Zu Tausenden zogen sie durch die Straßen, legten das Herz des Finanzdistrikts lahm: In New York haben Demonstranten vor der Wall Street gegen den Einfluss der Banken protestiert. Auch die Gewerkschaften schlossen sich an - ebenso wie Star-Regisseur Michael Moore. mehr…

Im Betrugs System Motoren: Jörg Asmussen, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, praktisch alle wichtigen Politiker der Grünen wie Cem, Joschka Fischer, Claudia Roth (die sowieso nie kapieren wird, was Politik ist) viele FDP, CSU (Stoiber u.a.), CDU Politiker.

Die Geschäfte der SPD Politiker mit der Internationalen Drogen Mafia

Und dann diese Peinlichkeit des Profi Betrügers und Gangsters Ackermann, der Betrugs Bank Deutsche Bank, wo Betrug zum Geschäfts System gehört.

Grenspan, das Alles ein krimineller Betrug ist.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=731G71Sahok]

Die Mega Betrugs Banken: Goldman Sachs und die Deutsche Bank mit Ackermann

Fotos der Wallstreet Demonstrationen

occupy-usa-01.htm Occupy USA Photos, 3 October 2011, Day 17 
occupy-wall-st8.htm Occupy Wall Street Pix 30 Sept-2 Oct Days 14-16 
OWS-11-0930-2 Occupy Wall Street Video 30 Sept 2011 Day 14-2 October 1, 2011
occupy-wall-st7.htm Occupy Wall Street Photos 30 Sept 2011 Day 14 
occupy-wall-st6.htm Occupy Wall Street Photos 27 Sept 2011 Day 11 

Wall Street und CIA

Von Lars Schall | 30.September 2011 um 1:10 Uhr

Die Central Intelligence Agency ist ein Geschöpf zur Wahrung langfristiger Wirtschaftsinteressen der Wall Street. Die Verbindung fällt recht offensichtlich aus, wenn man sich vor Augen hält, wer an der Schaffung der CIA im Jahre 1947 und ihrer nachfolgenden Entwicklung entscheidend beteiligt war.

Von Lars Schall

Der nachfolgende Artikel ist ein Auszug aus dem Buch „Mordanschlag 9/11. Eine kriminalistische Recherche zu Finanzen, Öl und Drogen“, das alsbald im Schild Verlag erscheinen wird. Ausgangspunkt des Textes “Wall Street und CIA“ ist der vorangehende Nachweis, dass sich die CIA spätestens seit 1977 für das Phänomen des globalen Peak Oil zu interessieren begann. Weiterlesen »

Greenspan – US-Bankensystem ist voller Betrug

Hier haben wir eine Aussage vom ehemaligen Chef der Fed, Alan Greenspan, die ist der Hammer! Er sagt, das US-Bankensystem ist voller Betrug, kriminell, wärend sein Nachfolger Ben Bernanke ganz nervös neben ihm sitzt und sich diese Wahrheit anhören muss. Jetzt haben wir es direkt aus dem Mund des „Chefs“ persönlich.

Er äusserte sich anlässlich der Feier auf Jekyll Island am vergangenen Wochenende und sie waren unter sich, deshalb möglichweise diese Offenheit. Das Publikum draussen sollte das sicher nicht hören.

Bankenrettung II

On Charges of “antisemitism” at Occupy Wall Street
Max Ajl

October 2, 2011 - …What I am disappointed to see is that some people claiming to be leftist supporters of Palestinian rights – but who are neither leftists nor supporters of Palestinian rights – are complaining about “antisemitism” at Occupy Wall Street. To be clear, there are internet wackos and real wackos everywhere…But then I see one Daniel Sieradski, whose primary purpose in life seems to be commoditizing his dissent, suggesting that a sign which reads, “End financial aid to Israel, end occupation of Gaza,” is going to scare off the “7 million” [sic] Jewish New Yorkers who support murdering Palestinian children…. continua / continued [81981] [ 03-oct-2011 18:08 ECT ]

Von Holger Steltzner Jetzt geht wieder die Angst vor einem Sturm auf die Banken um. Der Brennpunkt der Krise liegt diesmal in Europa. Die Amerikaner haben die richtigen Lehren aus dem Zusammenbruch von Lehman gezogen. Mehr

Going After Goldman: A Crackdown on Financial Crime or a Kabuki Play Maneuvre to Avoid Bringing Criminal Charges by Danny Schechter
Global Research, April 18, 2010 ………………………….. http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18720

Geschrieben in Economy - Wirtschaft | Keine Kommentare »